Skip to main content

Test Coverage Analysis - ML-KEM Implementation

Overview​

Comprehensive analysis of security test coverage for the ML-KEM cipher layer implementation, including functional tests, security tests, negative tests, and attack scenario tests.

Overall Security Test Coverage: 60% (Good)

Test Files Overview​

Primary Test Files​

  1. mlkem-cipher-layer-security.test.js (1003 lines)

    • Comprehensive security tests
    • Key size validation tests
    • Malformed input handling tests
    • Constant-time validation tests
    • Error message sanitization tests
    • Zeroization verification tests

  2. mlkem-cipher-layer-zeroization.test.js (209 lines)

    • Zeroization verification tests
    • Memory cleanup tests
    • Exception path tests

  3. mlkem-cipher-layer.test.js (1128+ lines)

    • Functional tests
    • Integration tests
    • Key generation tests
    • Encryption/decryption tests

  4. MLKEMTimingTests.stories.js (712 lines)

    • Interactive timing tests (Storybook)
    • Browser-based timing analysis
    • Constant-time validation

  5. mlkem-cipher-layer-browser.test.js

    • Browser environment tests
    • Web Crypto API tests

  6. mlkem-cipher-layer-debug-logging.test.js

    • Debug logging tests
    • Error handling tests

Test Coverage by Category​

Functional Tests​

Coverage: ✅ Excellent (50+ tests)

Tested Areas:

  • ✅ Key generation
  • ✅ Key validation
  • ✅ Encryption
  • ✅ Decryption
  • ✅ Key format conversion (Uint8Array ↔ XCryptoKey)
  • ✅ Parameter validation
  • ✅ Metadata generation
  • ✅ Round-trip encryption/decryption

Status: Comprehensive functional test coverage

Security Tests​

Coverage: ✅ Good (30+ tests)

Key Size Validation Tests​

Coverage: ✅ Excellent

Tested:

  • ✅ Public key size validation (1184 bytes)
  • ✅ Private key size validation (64 bytes)
  • ✅ Encapsulated key size validation (1088 bytes)
  • ✅ Invalid key size rejection
  • ✅ Specific error messages for invalid sizes

Location: mlkem-cipher-layer-security.test.js:82-271

Status: Comprehensive key size validation

Malformed Input Handling Tests​

Coverage: ✅ Good

Tested:

  • ✅ All-zero encapsulated key rejection
  • ✅ Randomized encapsulated key rejection
  • ✅ Truncated encapsulated key rejection
  • ✅ Extended encapsulated key rejection
  • ✅ Missing encapsulated key rejection
  • ✅ Invalid IV size rejection
  • ✅ Invalid salt size rejection

Location: mlkem-cipher-layer-security.test.js:273-407

Status: Good malformed input handling

Gaps:

  • ⚠️ Missing tests for extremely large inputs (DoS)
  • ⚠️ Missing tests for malformed public keys
  • ⚠️ Missing tests for malformed private keys

Constant-Time Validation Tests​

Coverage: ✅ Good

Tested:

  • ✅ validateKeys() timing consistency
  • ✅ Valid vs invalid keys timing
  • ✅ Null vs invalid keys timing
  • ✅ Different key types timing
  • ✅ Encryption timing consistency
  • ✅ Decryption timing consistency

Location:

  • mlkem-cipher-layer-security.test.js:549-626
  • MLKEMTimingTests.stories.js (interactive tests)

Status: Good timing attack protection tests

Limitations:

  • ⚠️ JavaScript timing is variable (JIT, GC)
  • ⚠️ Perfect constant-time impossible in JavaScript
  • ⚠️ Tests verify best-effort constant-time

Error Message Sanitization Tests​

Coverage: ✅ Good

Tested:

  • ✅ No sensitive data in encryption errors
  • ✅ No sensitive data in decryption errors
  • ✅ Generic error messages
  • ✅ Error message length limits
  • ✅ No key material in errors
  • ✅ No IV/salt in errors

Location: mlkem-cipher-layer-security.test.js:628-722

Status: Good error message sanitization

Zeroization Verification Tests​

Coverage: ✅ Excellent

Tested:

  • ✅ Shared secret zeroization after encryption
  • ✅ Shared secret zeroization after decryption
  • ✅ IV and salt zeroization after encryption
  • ✅ Zeroization on exception paths
  • ✅ CryptoKey reference clearing

Location: mlkem-cipher-layer-zeroization.test.js

Status: Comprehensive zeroization verification

Negative Tests​

Coverage: ✅ Good (25+ tests)

Tested:

  • ✅ Invalid key formats
  • ✅ Missing keys
  • ✅ Null/undefined keys
  • ✅ Invalid parameter sizes
  • ✅ Malformed payloads
  • ✅ Wrong key pairs
  • ✅ Missing parameters

Status: Good negative test coverage

Attack Scenario Tests​

Coverage: ⚠️ Partial (15+ tests)

Tested:

  • ✅ Key size validation attacks
  • ✅ Malformed encapsulated key attacks
  • ✅ Timing attack scenarios
  • ✅ Error message leakage attacks

Missing:

  • ❌ DoS via large input attacks
  • ❌ IV tracking memory exhaustion attacks
  • ❌ Rate limiting attack scenarios
  • ❌ Key collision attacks
  • ❌ Replay attack scenarios

Status: Partial attack scenario coverage

Recommendation: Add 20 additional attack scenario tests

Timing Attack Tests​

Coverage: ✅ Good (5 tests)

Tested:

  • ✅ validateKeys() timing consistency (Storybook)
  • ✅ Encryption timing consistency (Storybook)
  • ✅ Decryption timing consistency (Storybook)
  • ✅ Null vs invalid keys timing (Storybook)
  • ✅ Different key types timing (Storybook)

Location: MLKEMTimingTests.stories.js

Status: Good timing attack protection tests

Limitations:

  • ⚠️ Browser-based tests (Storybook)
  • ⚠️ JavaScript timing variability
  • ⚠️ Best-effort constant-time verification

Test Coverage Gaps​

Critical Gaps​

  1. DoS Attack Tests

    • ❌ Missing tests for extremely large inputs (1GB+)
    • ❌ Missing tests for IV tracking memory exhaustion
    • ❌ Missing tests for rapid encryption attacks
    • ❌ Missing tests for rate limiting

  2. Memory Exhaustion Tests

    • ❌ Missing tests for IV tracking growth
    • ❌ Missing tests for many concurrent operations
    • ❌ Missing tests for cleanup failure scenarios

  3. AAD Validation Tests

    • ❌ Missing tests for AAD (not implemented)
    • ❌ Missing tests for message reordering attacks

  4. Key Collision Tests

    • ❌ Missing tests for IV tracking key collisions
    • ❌ Missing tests for public key hash collisions

  5. Replay Attack Tests

    • ❌ Missing tests for message replay detection
    • ❌ Missing tests for nonce reuse

High Priority Gaps​

  1. Rate Limiting Tests

    • ❌ Missing tests for rate limiting (not implemented)
    • ❌ Missing tests for operation quotas

  2. Key Rotation Tests

    • ❌ Missing tests for key rotation (not implemented)
    • ❌ Missing tests for key versioning

  3. Audit Logging Tests

    • ❌ Missing tests for security event logging (not implemented)
    • ❌ Missing tests for error event logging

  4. Performance Tests

    • ⚠️ Basic performance tests exist
    • ❌ Missing stress tests
    • ❌ Missing load tests

  5. Integration Tests

    • ⚠️ Basic integration tests exist
    • ❌ Missing end-to-end protocol tests
    • ❌ Missing multi-layer cascade tests

Test Quality Assessment​

Strengths​

✅ Comprehensive Security Tests

  • Key size validation thoroughly tested
  • Malformed input handling well tested
  • Zeroization verification comprehensive
  • Timing attack protection tested

✅ Good Test Organization

  • Tests organized by category
  • Clear test descriptions
  • Good test coverage documentation

✅ Interactive Testing

  • Storybook-based timing tests
  • Browser environment testing
  • Real Web Crypto API testing

✅ Negative Testing

  • Good coverage of error cases
  • Invalid input handling tested
  • Edge cases covered

Weaknesses​

❌ Missing DoS Tests

  • No tests for large input attacks
  • No tests for memory exhaustion
  • No tests for rate limiting

❌ Missing Attack Scenario Tests

  • Limited attack scenario coverage
  • Missing replay attack tests
  • Missing key collision tests

❌ Missing Integration Tests

  • Limited end-to-end testing
  • Missing protocol-level tests
  • Missing cascade layer tests

Priority 0: Critical (Before Production)​

Estimated Time: 15-20 hours

  1. DoS Attack Tests (10 tests)

    • Test 1GB+ plaintext encryption
    • Test IV tracking memory exhaustion
    • Test rapid encryption attacks
    • Test many concurrent operations
    • Test cleanup failure scenarios

  2. Memory Exhaustion Tests (5 tests)

    • Test IV tracking growth limits
    • Test cleanup effectiveness
    • Test memory usage monitoring

  3. AAD Validation Tests (5 tests)

    • Test AAD inclusion (after implementation)
    • Test AAD format validation
    • Test message reordering prevention

Priority 1: High (Within 1 Week)​

Estimated Time: 10-15 hours

  1. Rate Limiting Tests (5 tests)

    • Test rate limiting (after implementation)
    • Test operation quotas
    • Test circuit breakers

  2. Key Collision Tests (5 tests)

    • Test IV tracking key collisions
    • Test public key hash collisions
    • Test collision handling

  3. Replay Attack Tests (5 tests)

    • Test message replay detection (after implementation)
    • Test nonce reuse prevention
    • Test timestamp validation

Priority 2: Medium (Within 1 Month)​

Estimated Time: 20-30 hours

  1. Integration Tests (10 tests)

    • End-to-end protocol tests
    • Multi-layer cascade tests
    • Key exchange protocol tests

  2. Performance Tests (10 tests)

    • Stress tests
    • Load tests
    • Performance regression tests

  3. Key Rotation Tests (5 tests)

    • Key rotation API tests (after implementation)
    • Key versioning tests
    • Migration tests

Test Execution Environment​

Jest Tests​

Environment: jsdom
Coverage: Node.js + Browser simulation
Status: ✅ Good

Files:

  • mlkem-cipher-layer-security.test.js
  • mlkem-cipher-layer-zeroization.test.js
  • mlkem-cipher-layer.test.js

Limitations:

  • ⚠️ Web Crypto API mocked in some tests
  • ⚠️ Timing tests limited by Jest environment

Storybook Tests​

Environment: Browser (Chrome/Firefox)
Coverage: Real Web Crypto API
Status: ✅ Excellent

Files:

  • MLKEMTimingTests.stories.js

Advantages:

  • ✅ Real browser environment
  • ✅ Real Web Crypto API
  • ✅ Interactive testing
  • ✅ Visual verification

Test Metrics​

Coverage Statistics​

CategoryTestsCoverageStatus
Functional Tests50+95%✅ Excellent
Security Tests30+60%✅ Good
Negative Tests25+80%✅ Good
Attack Scenario Tests15+40%⚠️ Partial
Timing Attack Tests580%✅ Good
Zeroization Tests8100%✅ Excellent

Overall Security Test Coverage: 60%

Test Execution Time​

  • Jest Tests: ~30 seconds
  • Storybook Tests: Interactive (manual)
  • Total: ~30 seconds automated

Status: ✅ Fast test execution

Recommendations​

Immediate Actions​

  1. Add DoS Attack Tests (Priority 0)

    • Large input tests
    • Memory exhaustion tests
    • Rate limiting tests

  2. Add Attack Scenario Tests (Priority 0)

    • Replay attack tests
    • Key collision tests
    • AAD validation tests

  3. Enhance Integration Tests (Priority 1)

    • End-to-end protocol tests
    • Multi-layer cascade tests

Short-Term Actions​

  1. Add Performance Tests

    • Stress tests
    • Load tests
    • Performance regression tests

  2. Add Key Rotation Tests

    • Key rotation API tests
    • Key versioning tests

  3. Add Audit Logging Tests

    • Security event logging tests
    • Error event logging tests

Conclusion​

The ML-KEM implementation has good security test coverage (60%) with comprehensive functional tests and excellent zeroization verification. However, critical gaps exist in DoS attack testing and attack scenario coverage.

Test Coverage: ✅ GOOD (60% security coverage)

Key Strengths:

  • ✅ Comprehensive key size validation tests
  • ✅ Excellent zeroization verification
  • ✅ Good timing attack protection tests
  • ✅ Good error message sanitization tests

Key Gaps:

  • ❌ Missing DoS attack tests
  • ❌ Missing memory exhaustion tests
  • ❌ Missing AAD validation tests
  • ❌ Missing replay attack tests

Recommendation: Add 20 additional security tests for DoS scenarios and edge cases (estimated 15-20 hours)

Document Version: 1.0
Last Updated: January 2025